![]() ![]() ![]() I for one use it everyday and find nothing wrong with it. You find it overwhelming and less useful that doesn’t take into account the people who use it. I would generalise and say it is useless. Every one has their own way of learning and own way of grasping things. Some people find digital painting too overwhelming but we do not say digital painting applications are a failure. With that logic you can call anything a failure. Well again I would say it is an extreme conclusion of the situation. I would rather have a total redesign of stabilization than, I don’t know, the colorize mask? If so many users are totally lost and don’t understand how to use it, then the feature failed to meet its goals. You see, it is not something superficial, it is a basic feature in all other softwares. So I think there needs to be some form of solution to ease the transition of users. We have an over complex feature that nobody really knows how to use it.Īnd most of the complaints such as your are from the users coming from other software. if I understand correctly anyone (except the Krita’s devs… maybe) really understand how the feature works. Thanks, I will try I think it is a great idea. Recreating settings + brushes similar to Paint tool sai? Not for my own account, but I remember seeing here in the forum, twice or thrice, CSP users saying that the Dynamic Brush had a similar feel and behaviour to CSP’s stabilizer.Įdit: add: Here an example of such discussion. Specially if you want (somewhat) parity with CSP stabilizers. ![]() I personally go up to basic in stabs but the few times i venture off - i did find settings to be hard to grasp at first and require a number of trial and error that someone in the creative groove in the middle of painting would get annoy off.Īlso I highly recommend trying the Dynamic Brush Tool. My suggestion for ease of use though is this Which add into account my previous suggestion here Putting the first 3 like this doesn`t make it much different from sai in particular (i use sai since its the only other app i know and used off extensibly) Personally I would add a few more predefined steps that are based on S3 settings that goes higher and higher.Ĭustomization are good for people like me who go balls to the wall with it and patient enough but its not for everyone and definitely something not a starting artist would explore. I agree that krita’s stabs are a bit disjointed but i find them similar enough in the way they are used. It goes something like barely there to you definitely feel it. It might not be the flashiest new feature but it makes a world of difference to many people. I would strongly suggest the devs to rethink that feature. CSP, Sai and Photoshop do it so well and in a simple manner, I really think Krita should do the same. I never find that sweet spot that I need. I mean the distance goes from 3 to 1000, isn’t it too much precision? There are so many options that it becomes overwhelming for the user to use them.Īnd the worst is: no matter how I change those options, it always feels strange. ![]() The interface was very easy to customize, the brush selection was good enough and just felt lighter for everyday use.īut there is just one thing, one big thorn on my side and I will be honest with you guys:įirst, there are 3 different modes? Basic is for older tablets, weighted is like stabilizer but without the delay (and the annoying lag)… Does we really need three different modes? I’m a hobbyist and was using Clip Studio before, but I decided to give Krita a chance and I loved it. I’ve been using Krita exclusively for the last 2 years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |